Thursday, 10 April 2008

Govt removes ZCI case from Competition Commission, sale goes through

Mining Weekly report that the sale of ZCI's shares in Konkola Copper Mines (KCM) to Vedanta Resources has finally gone through. Vedanta have also issued a press release. So have ZCI.

The story is slightly strangely worded, "The Government of the Republic of Zambia had removed this transaction from the jurisdiction of the Zambian Competition Commission, ZCI said." Odd. The ZCI press release contains the same concept, "the Government of the Republic of Zambia invoked section 3f of the Zambian Competition and Fair Trading Act, which effectively removes this transaction from the jurisdiction of the ZCC." Does that mean the competition commission never completed its investigation and was politically interefered with?

Conspiracy theorisist (I don't necesarilly include myself, but there are plenty buzzing around this issue) will no doubt note the 'good news' of Vedanta's acceptance of the new tax regime in the last couple of days, and the Government's very welcoming response.

The story continues: "ZCI has, in turn, provided Vedanta with the requisite documentation to effect transfer of the remaining 28,4% of Konkola Copper Mines," it stated in a note to the Johannesburg bourse."As the transaction has now been completed, caution is no longer required to be exercised by shareholders when dealing in their securities," said ZCI. "The directors are currently examining the options for the future of the company and will shortly present shareholders with these proposals in order to involve all stakeholders in this process."

Labels: , , , , , ,

Sunday, 30 March 2008

MinewatchZambia publishes Vedanta Resources secret contract to buy Konkola Copper Mines

MineWatchZambia, the website that brought the Zambian public access to previously secret Development Agreements between the state and international mining houses, is proud to announce another coup. We have received from an anonymous contact what we believe to be a genuine copy of one of the contracts we did not previously have access to. Unlike some of the other contracts previously leaked to us, these contracts are not signed so they should be treated with mild scepticism. On the other hand, they look pretty convincing to me!

The documents appear to be the Development Agreement between the Zambian state and Vedanta Resources, which took on a 51% stake in Konkola Copper Mines (KCM), and was signed in 2004.

The document is posted at http://www.minewatchzambia.com/reports/KCM2004.pdf .

Readers' analysis and discussion of the document would be extremely welcome. This site works best when readers get stuck into discussion.

I have not attempted a close reading of the whole thing, but a couple of things interested me:
1) Page 2, paras 6-11: discusses the 'call option' for ZCI's shares, which the company is currently trying to exercise, but the contract as a whole does not clarify the detail of this deal. The document refers to the call option, "Vedanta holds an option over ZCI Holdings' shares in KCM, exercisable in certain circumstances." That's not very helpful without access to the Call Option Deed. Any readers feeeling like leaking this further document would be making an important contribution to freedom of information in Zambia! Contact me if you want postal detals - otherwise use the email address on the site.
2) Sections 21-24: As previously discussed on this blog, some of the DAs contained clauses specifying that any arbitration between the Government and companies over the new mines taxes would occur under the World Bank's ICSID. In this updated KCM agreement, a different system is proposed, the "UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules" overseen by a sole arbitrator.
UNCITRAL is a UN body with a mandate similar to that of ICSID. The document continues, "The appointing authority the Secretary General of the Permanent Court of Arbitration at the Hague. The place of arbitration shall be Johannesburg and the language of the arbitration shall be English." This helps explain comments made by some commentators during the politicised discussions over possible 'legal action' relating to breaches of stability clauses. I am currently assuming the companies are going to take the new tax regime on the chin and will not pursue their previous threats of legal action. Nonetheless, if we find ourselves having to revisit the issue, this might be relevant. So might the comments under Section 23 where the Government appears to waive its own sovereignty. Mr K's previous comments on the legality or otherwise of DAs might be relevant here, particularly since the following paragraph places the whole thing under 'Zambian law'. Interestingly confusing - can we call in the lawyers!

I look forward to others' comments.

Alastair

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Monday, 10 March 2008

'Thorough investigation' delays ZCI's Konkola share sale to Vedanta

The Post reports that Zambia's Competition Commission has withdrawn authorisation for Zambia Copper Investments (ZCI) to sell its stake in Konkola Copper Mines (KCM) to Vedanta Resources. While the companies continue to insist that the delay is 'simply procedural', the tone of the Competition Commission's comments could be interpreted as reflecting a more serious concern with what has always been a controversial sale.

ZCI recognised that the Competition Commission has "withdrawn an interim authorisation that was granted earlier to Vedanta.” Zambia Competition Commission (ZCC) acting executive director Thula Kaira has said there was need to undertake a thorough independent assessment to ascertain the suitability of the transfer of 28.4 per cent shares in KCM to Vedanta Resources at a cost of US $213.15 million. “It is mandatory for the two companies to seek our authorisation to carryout a transaction of that magnitude but it is too early to say we have allowed the transaction or not since they have just applied and an independent assessment team will need to study the proposal before we can make a decision," said Kaira.

Currently, the KCM share structure comprises Vedanta with 51 per cent while ZCI has 24.8 per cent with the Zambian government through ZCCM Investment Holdings having 24.2 per cent, but with this development, Vedanta would now control 75.8 per cent shares of Zambia's largest copper mines. Independent shareholders have protested (on this blog as much as anywhere else) that the price offered for the shares both disadvantages them. The sale also removes any potential benefits to Copperbelt communities that might have flowed from a development scheme built into the structure of ZCI and that was designed to redistribute the benefits of any dividends paid out by KCM. These concerns have dovetailed with an 'economic empowerment' agenda currently making waves in the Zambian political scene as the Government, which has been responsible for the sale of vast numbers of Zambian companies into foreign ownership, seeks to rebalance relations between foreign capital and local investors.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Tuesday, 19 February 2008

ZCI supports Rothschild's valuation of its KCM shares

This report in The Post yesterday. I reproduce it in full as the issues are complex and I have little to add.

ZAMBIA Copper Investments (ZCI) has supported Rothschild’s valuation of its 28.4 per cent shares in Konkola Copper Mines (KCM), saying it correctly employed the discounted cash flow (DCF) method in determining the option price.

And the board of the ZCI is undertaking an assessment of Zambia Competition Commission (ZCC)’s statement that Vedanta Resources Plc could not buy additional shares in KCM without its authorisation.

In a statement posted on its website after minority shareholders claimed that Rothschild’s valuation of ZCI’s shares meant Vedanta Resources Plc would increase its stake in KCM at a very low price, ZCI stated that the industry standard for valuing producing mining assets was through the use of the discounted cash flow method.

“Rothschild has correctly employed the DCF method in determining the option price. Under the Call Option Deed, ZCI has no legal basis to challenge Rothschild’s valuation,” stated ZCI. “Vedanta now has the right to acquire ZCI’s interest at the Option exercise price and it must make this decision as soon as reasonably practicable after the Option Exercise Price was made known.”

Vedanta Resources Plc’s bid to acquire the 28.4 per cent shares owned by ZCI landed into trouble following its rejection by ZCI shareholders who feel cheated by the “undervalued” offer price of US $213.85 million.

The move faced further trouble from the Competition Commission which said Vedanta needs authorisation before increasing its stake in KCM through its Call-Option Deed with ZCI.

Vedanta currently holds a Call-Option Deed on the 28.4 per cent of KCM still owned by ZCI whereby they agreed that the latter, upon exit, would offer its 28.4 per cent shares in KCM to the former.

On January 17, 2008, independent investment bank N M Rothschild & Sons Limited, pursuant to their appointment by Vedanta and ZCI to establish the price at which Vedanta shall have the option to acquire ZCI's 28.42 per cent interest in KCM submitted their report.

Rothschild, who assessed the value as it stood in August 2005, came up with the figure of US$213.85 million for the 28.4 per cent, thus evaluating 100 per cent of KCM at US$750 million.

Vedanta has the right to accept or refuse to go on with the call, but ZCI cannot refuse to sell. As a result, Vedanta now has a reasonable period within which to accept or reject the valuation price as determined by the bank.

However, from the figure that Rothschild came up with, Vedanta seems to have struck another bargain and may not hesitate to go ahead with the purchase.

According to a submission by Jean-Luc Chaillan, the trouble is that ZCI shareholders feel the shares have been undervalued and Vedanta will buy the shares very cheaply as it did to the 51 per cent shares in KCM, as latest independent evaluations for KCM shares are far more than that of Rothschild.

Vedanta bought 51 per cent of KCM stock in November 2004 for a mere US$48 million. Back then, this sale came under fire from a cross section of Zambian industrialists, unions, political parties and the media, and was described as an outrageous pillaging of Zambian resources.

All the evaluations conducted by various financial audit agencies are way above the Rothschild figure.

For instance, Morgan Stanley & Company International, in a survey about Vedanta dated December 15, 2005, evaluated the 51 per cent of KCM at US$1.321 billion, which makes KCM worth US$2.590 billion, far above the US$750 million proposed by Rothschild.

Other subsequent assessments are even higher.

When the Rothschild evaluation came out, financial analysts Lehman Brothers, immediately concluded that it was a bargain on the part of KCM because KCM was worth at least twice the suggested amount.

The Zambian government could not give its position on the matter, as mines deputy minister Maxwell Mwale said the Zambia Consolidated Copper Mines Investment Holdings (ZCCM-IH) which holds some shares in KCM on behalf of the government could comment on the matter.

However, ZCCM-IH general manager Joseph Chikolwa, who could have given government’s position on the matter, was reportedly out of the country to comment.

KCM is owned 51 per cent by Indian Vedanta; 28.4 per cent by ZCI, a legal entity from Bermuda; and 20.6 per cent ZCCM-IH (88 per cent of which is owned by the Zambian government).

ZCI shareholders also argue on dividends that did not accrue to them.

In the statement recently released on its website, ZCI stated that it had in fact received dividends on its shares subsequent to the exercise of the Call Option, although these have not – in the view of ZCI’s board – reflected the levels of free cash flow as determined in accordance with the Shareholders Agreement.

ZCI’s representatives on the board of KCM have strenuously argued for the distribution of higher dividends.

“Our considered view of our legal position is that we have no right to force a further or higher distribution of KCM’s reserves,” ZCI stated. “Rothschild had to value KCM as it perceived KCM’s assets at the Exercise Notice date, August 12, 2005. Rothschild had to ignore any information available after August 2005.

ZCI’s technical consultants made strong representations before the process began to ensure that IMCL considered the right data. IMCL appear to have had some difficulty in compiling the necessary technical data for the DCF model, since little information was available from August 2005.”

ZCI’s share price is the only available market valuation of ZCI and hence of ZCI’s share in KCM, since it is ZCI’s only non-financial asset.

As announced on 7 November 2005, ZCI and Vedanta originally attempted to agree on a list of documentation which would have enabled Rothschild to conduct a “desktop” valuation without the need for a full technical review of the assets.

ZCI and Vedanta were unable to agree on the list of documents, since ZCI felt that Vedanta wanted to include documentation which gave a very pessimistic view of the value of the assets.

Thereafter, terms of reference were agreed instructing Rothschild, with its mining consultants IMCL, to conduct a full technical review of the assets.

“During negotiations on Rothschild’s terms of reference it became apparent that the parties disagreed about the relevant date for the valuation,” ZCI stated.

“ZCI believed that the valuation should be conducted on an up-to-date basis, as at the date of Rothschild’s report, whereas Vedanta believed that the valuation should have been conducted as at the Exercise Notice date.

“The issue of the valuation date was particularly important as copper prices, and analysts’ price forecasts, rose significantly over the period in question.

“The parties then entered a lengthy arbitration process, under the terms of the Call-Option Deed, which was not concluded until July 2007.

“The conclusion of the arbitrator was announced on 25 June 2007. The arbitrator held that the valuation should be carried out as at the Exercise Notice date (i.e. 12 August 2005). There are no grounds for ZCI to appeal that decision.”

ZCI further stated that it remains bound by the terms of the Call-Option Deed, adding: “The Zambia Competition Commission has, however, asserted jurisdiction over the transfer of the shares and stated that its permission is required before completion of the sale can occur. The Board of ZCI is examining this presently.”

ZCC said the execution of the Call-Option Deed between Vedanta and ZCI was subject to authorisation.

ZCC wrote to the two parties advising them of the legal requirements of seeking authorisation from the commission before they could effect the transaction, according to the laws of Zambia.

Section 8 subsection (1) of Cap 417 of the Laws of Zambia states that: “Any persons who in the absence of authority from the commission whether as a principal or agent and whether by himself or his agent, participates in a merger between two or more independent enterprises engaged in manufacturing or distributing substantially similar goods or providing substantially similar services;

a takeover or one or more such enterprises by another enterprise, or by a person who controls another such enterprise shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable, upon conviction, to a fine not exceeding K10 million or imprisonment not exceeding five years or both.”

Subsection (2) of the same section further states that: “No merger or takeover made in contravention of subsection (1) shall have any legal effect and no rights or obligations imposed on the participating parties by any agreement in respect of the merger or takeover shall be legally enforceable.”

Vedanta Resources Plc has since engaged Lusaka Lawyer Eric Silwamba to start legal proceedings against those objecting its plans to acquire additional shares in KCM.

It is yet to give its position on the matter as a press query had been sent last week.

Labels: , , , , ,

Thursday, 22 March 2007

Parliamentary Committee Report to be presented tomorrow morning

++This entry is based on a note sent to the MineWatchZambia network by Peter Sinkamba, Executive Director of Citizens for a Better Environment, Kitwe: p_sinkamba@yahoo.co.uk. Peter's lobbying efforts are also reported in The Post newspaper today (as always with links to the Post, you need a subscription to access this). The Post also reports backing for MineWatchZambia's proposals for renegotiation of the Development Agreements from University of Zambia (UNZA) School of Mines Professor Imasiku Nyambe and Economics Association of Zambia (EAZ) national secretary Chibamba Kanyama.++

The Bill to amend the Mines and Mineral Act in Zambia has been tabled in parliament and presently it is at Committee Stage.

Relevant to the network is the Mineral Royalty Tax. According to the Bill, government is proposing to increase from 0.6 to 3% for base metals including copper. The proposal for gemstones and other precious metals is 5% and for other minerals is 2%.

The most frustrating thing is that government has inserted an exclusion clause. According to the draft bill mining companies which, by April 1st 2007, will be in possession of holding development agreements with government to pay less than the proposed figure will not be affected by the amendment. Fundamentally what this exemption implies is that we are just going around in circles. If all of the main existing mines are exempted from the increase then what are going to achieve by the increase in real terms?

The whole of last week our organization was busy lobbying with Copperbelt-based MPs, the Parliamentary Committee on Estimates (which is looking at the Bill), the Attorney General and the Minister of Mines, to on the one hand get the exclusion clause removed from the Bill and on the other hand introduce clauses which will govern appropriation of Royalty payments. We have made suggestions to the above mentioned to the effect that a percentage of Royalty tax need be retained in the mining areas for environmental and socio-economic mitigation. Our proposal is that 80% goes to central treasury, 10% goes towards a fund which will look at minerals development, and 10% is shared between the local councils and traditional councils in the areas where mining is taking place. The response on this aspect was quite favourable from above mentioned stakeholders and an assurance was given by the Attorney General that his office was going trigger the consulation process to integrate our proposal into the Bill.
To support our call for deletion of the exclusion clause, we indicated that some NGOs were already pursuing various avenues through which to deal with the companies, so insertion of such a clause would prejudice our strategy.

The Parlimentary Committee will present its report to the full House tomorrow morning (Friday 23 March) at around 9am. I suggest that those concerned follow-up the outcome [MinewatchZambia will attend the report launch and report back on this blog]. I further suggest that our proposal be backed by all those concerned with benefit-sharing issues in the extractive sector, perhaps by way of a petition.

Sincerely,
Peter Sinkamba

Labels: , , , , ,